The burden of proof lies with believers, not atheists from "summary" of Ateist Manifesto by Michel Onfray
Believers in gods must bear the burden of proof. If they believe in a deity, they must provide evidence. It is not the responsibility of atheists to disprove the existence of gods. The onus is on those who claim that such beings exist. The burden of proof lies squarely on the shoulders of believers. They must present convincing arguments and evidence to support their claims. Atheists are not making any positive claims about the existence of gods. They are simply stating that there is a lack of evidence to support the belief in such beings. The burden of proof does not fall on those who question or reject the existence of gods. It falls on those who assert that gods exist. Believers must provide evidence to support their claims. Believers often rely on faith as their justification for believing in gods. They argue that their faith is enough to sustain their beliefs. However, faith is not a sufficient basis for establishing the existence of gods. Faith is a subjective experience that varies from person to person. It is not a reliable method for determining the truth of a claim. In the absence of empirical evidence, believers may turn to philosophical arguments to support their beliefs. They may rely on logical reasoning or metaphysical speculation. However, these arguments are often speculative and open to interpretation. They do not provide concrete proof of the existence of gods. Believers may also point to personal experiences or anecdotes as evidence of the existence of gods. They may claim to have had mystical encounters or divine revelations. However, personal experiences are not reliable sources of evidence. They are subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors.- Believers in gods must bear the burden of proof. They must provide evidence to support their claims. Atheists do not have to disprove the existence of gods. The responsibility lies with those who assert that such beings exist. Faith, philosophical arguments, and personal experiences are not sufficient to establish the existence of gods. Believers must present compelling evidence to make their case.
Similar Posts
Brain's activity generates mind's experiences
The idea that the brain's activity generates the mind's experiences is a fundamental concept in neuroscience. Our brain is a co...
Empathy and compassion drive moral behavior
Empathy and compassion are the driving forces behind moral behavior. When we truly understand and feel the emotions of others, ...
Atheism is a valid and logical position
Atheism is a valid and logical position for several reasons. First and foremost, there is a lack of empirical evidence to suppo...
Religion is rooted in superstition and ignorance
The idea that religion is rooted in superstition and ignorance is a central theme in the book. Dawkins argues that religion is ...
Superstition is the enemy of progress
Superstition, with its irrational beliefs and magical thinking, stands in direct opposition to progress. It is a hindrance to t...
The idea of a divine creator is unnecessary to explain the complexity of the universe
The complexity of the universe is a fascinating subject that has long captivated human minds. For centuries, people have looked...