Objectivity in history is a myth from "summary" of What is History? by E. H. Carr
The notion of objectivity in history is often considered a myth by many historians. This idea challenges the traditional belief that history can be approached in a completely unbiased and objective manner. Instead, it suggests that historical accounts are inevitably colored by the perspectives and biases of the historian. Historians are not detached observers who simply gather and present facts. They are active participants in the process of historical interpretation, shaping the narrative based on their own beliefs, values, and cultural background. As such, objectivity in history becomes an unattainable ideal rather than a practical reality. The subjectivity of history is evident in the selection and interpretation of sources. Historians must choose which sources to include and which to exclude, a decision that is influenced by their own biases and preconcep...
Similar Posts
Historical knowledge is never complete or definitive
Historical knowledge is an ever-evolving and dynamic entity, subject to continuous reinterpretation and revision. This is becau...
Historicists believe society follows immutable laws
Historicists hold the view that there exist universal laws governing the development of societies, and that these laws are immu...
The study of history requires empathy and imagination
The study of history is not merely the memorization of facts and dates; it is a complex and nuanced discipline that requires a ...