Historical knowledge is never complete or definitive from "summary" of What is History? by E. H. Carr
Historical knowledge is an ever-evolving and dynamic entity, subject to continuous reinterpretation and revision. This is because historical facts are not fixed in stone but are instead constantly being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and perspectives. As Carr points out, historians must constantly be open to challenging their preconceived notions and beliefs about the past in order to arrive at a more nuanced and accurate understanding. The incompleteness of historical knowledge stems from the inherent limitations of the historical record. Historians must rely on fragmentary and often biased sources to reconstruct the past, leading to gaps in our understanding and room for interpretation. Moreover, historical events are complex and multifaceted, making it impossible to capture every detail and nuance in a single narrative. This is why historical knowledge is always provisional and subject to change as new evidence comes to light...
Similar Posts
Compromise is weakness
Compromise is weakness. That was the prevailing belief among many conservatives. It was seen as a sign of surrender, a lack of ...
The study of history requires empathy and imagination
The study of history is not merely the memorization of facts and dates; it is a complex and nuanced discipline that requires a ...
The study of history requires empathy and imagination
The study of history is not merely the memorization of facts and dates; it is a complex and nuanced discipline that requires a ...