There is a danger in essentializing religions as inherently violent or peaceful from "summary" of The Myth of Religious Violence by William T Cavanaugh
To essentialize religions as inherently violent or peaceful is to oversimplify complex phenomena. It ignores the diversity of beliefs and practices within each religious tradition. It fails to account for the ways in which religious ideas are interpreted and applied in different contexts. It overlooks the role of political, social, and economic factors in shaping religious behavior. Moreover, essentializing religions as inherently violent or peaceful can have dangerous consequences. It can lead to stereotypes and prejudices against religious groups. It can justify discrimination and violence against those perceived as "other." It can perpetuate a cycle of conflict and misunderstanding. By challenging the myth of religious violence, we can move beyond simplistic explanations for complex social phenomena. We can recognize the agency of individuals and communities in shaping their religious beliefs and practices. We can acknowledge the ways in which religion can be used to justify both violence and peace.- The danger in essentializing religions lies in the way it limits our understanding of the world. It prevents us from engaging with the complexities of human experience. It hinders our ability to build bridges across cultural and religious divides. By embracing nuance and complexity, we can move towards a more inclusive and compassionate society.
