Forensic evidence is not always as reliable as it seems from "summary" of The Invisible Gorilla by Christopher Chabris,Daniel Simons
Forensic evidence holds a special place in the criminal justice system. It is often viewed as irrefutable, solid proof of a person's guilt or innocence. The idea that science can provide definitive answers is comforting, but it is not always the case. In reality, forensic evidence can be quite unreliable. One reason for this unreliability is the human factor. Forensic analysis is conducted by people, and people are fallible. Mistakes can happen at any stage of the process, from collecting evidence at the crime scene to analyzing it in the lab. Human error, bias, and incompetence can all lead to inaccurate results. Another issue with forensic evidence is its subjectivity. Interpretation plays a significant role in analyzing evidence. Different experts may reach different c...
Similar Posts
Holmes's use of disguises
Holmes's use of disguises is a key element of his investigative technique. By transforming his appearance, Holmes is able to bl...
Minority communities are disproportionately affected by myths
Throughout the history of crime and criminal justice in the United States, minority communities have been the primary targets o...
Resolving conflicts
In life, conflicts are bound to happen. They can be big or small, personal or professional, but they all share one common threa...
Latent fingerprints require special processing techniques to be visible
Latent fingerprints, those impressions left behind by the ridges on the skin of the fingers, are invisible to the naked eye. In...
Different techniques are used to collect fingerprints at crime scenes
Fingerprints are one of the most common types of physical evidence found at crime scenes. They are unique to each individual an...