oter

Antiintellectualism is on the rise from "summary" of The Death of Expertise by Thomas M. Nichols

In an age when information is more abundant than ever before, it seems paradoxical that antiintellectualism is gaining ground. The death of expertise is not just a catchy phrase; it is a reflection of a disturbing trend in society. People are increasingly skeptical of experts and dismissive of their knowledge and opinions. This rejection of expertise is fueled by a combination of factors, such as the democratization of knowledge through the internet and social media, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the rise of populist movements that thrive on anti-elitism. The internet has democratized knowledge by making information more accessible to the masses. While this has empowered individuals to educate themselves on a wide range of topics, it has also created a breeding ground for misinformation and conspiracy theories. Social media platforms amplify and spread these falsehoods, making it difficult for experts to counteract them. As a result, people are more likely to believe in pseudoscience, fake news, and other forms of misinformation than to trust in the expertise of trained professionals. The erosion of trust in institutions is another contributing factor to the rise of antiintellectualism. Institutions that were once seen as bastions of knowledge and authority, such as universities, the media, and government agencies, have come under increasing scrutiny and criticism. This erosion of trust has led people to question the motives and credibility of experts who are associated with these institutions. As a result, expertise is often dismissed as biased or untrustworthy, further fueling antiintellectual sentiments. Populist movements have capitalized on anti-elitism to gain support and legitimacy. By portraying experts as out-of-touch elites who are disconnected from the concerns of ordinary people, these movements have successfully undermined the authority of expertise. This has created a climate where expertise is viewed with suspicion and disdain, and where experts are often seen as part of the problem rather than the solution. The consequences of antiintellectualism are grave. When expertise is devalued and dismissed, decisions are made based on ignorance rather than knowledge. This can have serious implications for public policy, healthcare, education, and other areas where expertise is crucial. In order to combat antiintellectualism, we must reaffirm the value of expertise, promote critical thinking and media literacy, and hold institutions accountable for upholding the standards of knowledge and truth. Only by doing so can we reverse the troubling trend of the death of expertise.
    oter

    The Death of Expertise

    Thomas M. Nichols

    Open in app
    Now you can listen to your microbooks on-the-go. Download the Oter App on your mobile device and continue making progress towards your goals, no matter where you are.