Legal system relies on consistency from "summary" of The Common Law Tradition by Karl N. Llewellyn
Consistency is a fundamental principle in the legal system that ensures predictability and stability. Without consistency, the law would be arbitrary and unpredictable, leading to chaos and injustice. In the Common Law Tradition, consistency is maintained through the doctrine of stare decisis, which requires judges to follow precedents set in previous cases. This principle helps to ensure that similar cases are decided in a similar way, promoting fairness and equality before the law. By relying on consistency, the legal system can provide guidance to individuals and businesses on how to conduct themselves in society. Consistent application of the law allows people to understand their rights and obligations, and to make informed decisions based on predictable outcomes. This predictability is essential for maintaining social order and stability. In addition to promoting predictability, consistency also helps to build trust in the legal system. When individuals see that similar cases are decided in a similar way, they are more likely to have confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. This trust is essential for the legitimacy of the legal system and for the rule of law to be upheld. Furthermore, consistency in the legal system helps to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the administration of justice. By following established precedents, judges can resolve cases more quickly and with less uncertainty. This allows the legal system to function smoothly and to deliver timely justice to those who seek it.- Consistency is a cornerstone of the legal system that underpins its legitimacy, predictability, and efficiency. Without consistency, the law would be arbitrary, unpredictable, and ultimately unjust. By maintaining consistency through the doctrine of stare decisis, the legal system can uphold the rule of law and ensure justice for all.
