oter

Legal principles guide judicial decisionmaking from "summary" of The Common Law Tradition by Karl N. Llewellyn

Judges are tasked with the responsibility of interpreting and applying the law in order to reach a just decision in a case. This process is not arbitrary; rather, it is guided by legal principles that have been developed over time through the common law tradition. These principles serve as a framework for judges to analyze the facts of a case and determine the appropriate legal outcome. Legal principles are not rigid rules that must be blindly followed; rather, they are flexible guidelines that help judges to reason through complex legal issues. By considering past decisions and legal doctrines, judges are able to apply these principles to new cases and ensure consistency and predictability in the law. In the common law tradition, judges are not bound by strict statutory rules; instead, they have the flexibility to interpret and adapt the law to changing societal norms and values. This allows the law to evolve over time and remain relevant in an ever-changing world. While legal principles provide a foundation for judicial decision-making, judges must also consider the specific facts and circumstances of each case. This requires a careful analysis of the evidence presented, as well as an understanding of the underlying legal principles that apply.
  1. The goal of judicial decision-making is to reach a fair and just outcome that is consistent with legal principles and societal values. By following a reasoned and principled approach, judges are able to uphold the rule of law and maintain the integrity of the legal system.
  2. Open in app
    The road to your goals is in your pocket! Download the Oter App to continue reading your Microbooks from anywhere, anytime.
oter

The Common Law Tradition

Karl N. Llewellyn

Open in app
Now you can listen to your microbooks on-the-go. Download the Oter App on your mobile device and continue making progress towards your goals, no matter where you are.