Judges interpret statutes from "summary" of The Common Law Tradition by Karl N. Llewellyn
The interpretation of statutes is a crucial task that falls on the shoulders of judges within the common law tradition. When faced with a statute, judges must carefully analyze its language and intent to determine how it should be applied to a particular case. This process requires a deep understanding of the law and a keen eye for detail. Judges must first examine the text of the statute itself, paying close attention to the specific words and phrases used. They must consider the plain meaning of the language, taking into account any definitions or interpretations that may be provided within the statute or elsewhere in the law. However, the plain meaning is not always clear or sufficient to resolve a case. In cases where the plain meaning is ambiguous or does not f...
Similar Posts
Human nature is inherently selfish and competitive
In the state of nature, where there is no overarching authority to enforce laws and maintain order, human beings are driven by ...
Fostering unity and inclusivity
The idea of bringing people together and ensuring that everyone is included is a central theme in the writings of Ruth Bader Gi...
Recognizing precedent shapes legal analysis and decisionmaking
The concept that recognizing precedent shapes legal analysis and decision-making is a fundamental aspect of the practice of law...
Society influences legal development
The development of law cannot be separated from the influence of society. Laws are not static entities but are shaped by the cu...