Judges interpret statutes from "summary" of The Common Law Tradition by Karl N. Llewellyn
The interpretation of statutes is a crucial task that falls on the shoulders of judges within the common law tradition. When faced with a statute, judges must carefully analyze its language and intent to determine how it should be applied to a particular case. This process requires a deep understanding of the law and a keen eye for detail. Judges must first examine the text of the statute itself, paying close attention to the specific words and phrases used. They must consider the plain meaning of the language, taking into account any definitions or interpretations that may be provided within the statute or elsewhere in the law. However, the plain meaning is not always clear or sufficient to resolve a case. In cases where the plain meaning is ambiguous or does not f...
Similar Posts
Legal system relies on consistency
Consistency is a fundamental principle in the legal system that ensures predictability and stability. Without consistency, the ...
Precedent shapes legal norms
The common law system is built upon the principle of precedent, which is the idea that decisions made in previous cases should ...
Legal system maintains coherence
The legal system is a complex web of rules, regulations, and principles that govern society. Within this intricate framework, m...