oter

The narrative around GMOs should focus on evidencebased discussions rather than fear-mongering from "summary" of Seeds of Science by Mark Lynas

The discussion surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) should be grounded in evidence rather than fear. In the debate over GMOs, fear-mongering has often overshadowed scientific evidence, leading to misinformation and confusion among the public. It is crucial to shift the narrative towards evidence-based discussions to provide a more accurate understanding of GMOs and their potential benefits. By focusing on evidence-based discussions, we can ensure that decisions about GMOs are made with a sound understanding of the science behind them. This approach allows for a more nuanced and informed debate, where the benefits and risks of GMOs can be weighed against each other based on credible evidence. Fear-mongering, on the other hand, tends to rely on emotions and misconceptions rather than scientific facts, which can lead to irrational fears and misguided policies. In "S...
    Read More
    Continue reading the Microbook on the Oter App. You can also listen to the highlights by choosing micro or macro audio option on the app. Download now to keep learning!
    oter

    Seeds of Science

    Mark Lynas

    Open in app
    Now you can listen to your microbooks on-the-go. Download the Oter App on your mobile device and continue making progress towards your goals, no matter where you are.