Hobbes and Boyle engaged in a debate about the nature of knowledge from "summary" of Leviathan and the Air-Pump by Steven Shapin,Simon Schaffer
Hobbes and Boyle found themselves at odds over the fundamental nature of knowledge. For Hobbes, knowledge was based on sensory experience and the workings of the human mind. He believed that the only true knowledge came from what could be observed and understood through the senses. Boyle, on the other hand, argued that knowledge could also come from experimentation and the use of instruments to investigate the natural world. Boyle's approach to knowledge was grounded in the idea that empirical evidence and scientific experimentation were essential for understanding the world. He believed that through careful observation and experimentation, humans could uncover the secrets of nature and expand their knowledge beyond what could be perceive...
Similar Posts
Preconceived notions can cloud judgment
When we approach a new situation or idea, our minds are often already filled with preconceived notions and beliefs. These preco...
Moral law must be based on reason
The concept of moral law being based on reason is a fundamental principle in Kant's philosophy. According to Kant, reason is th...
Ignorance is not something to be ashamed of
Ignorance is not something to be ashamed of. This concept may seem counterintuitive to many, as society often places a high val...
Critique of pure reason helps avoid skepticism
The Critique of Pure Reason serves as a defense against skepticism, a philosophical position that doubts the possibility of kno...
The discovery of new elements pushes the boundaries of human knowledge
The quest to uncover new elements has always been a driving force in the field of chemistry. Each new discovery not only adds t...