oter

Boyle's airpump experiments challenged Hobbes's view from "summary" of Leviathan and the Air-Pump by Steven Shapin,Simon Schaffer

In their exploration of Boyle's airpump experiments and their implications, Shapin and Schaffer shed light on the intellectual clash between Boyle and Hobbes. Boyle's experiments were not just about air or the vacuum, but about challenging prevailing views on the nature of knowledge and authority. Hobbes, a prominent thinker of his time, believed in the power of reason and the authority of the sovereign. He argued that knowledge should come from established authorities and that experimentation was unnecessary and unreliable. This clashed with Boyle's experimental approach, which emphasized the importance of empirical evidence and the need to question established beliefs. Boyle's airpump experiments were a direct challenge to Hobbes's view, as they demonstrated the power of experimental knowledge over mere speculation. Through careful observation and systematic experimentation, Boyle was able to uncover new truths about the nature of air and the vacuum. These experiments not only expanded human knowledge but also questioned the authority of traditional sources of knowledge. By showing that knowledge could be gained through experimentation, Boyle undermined Hobbes's belief in the infallibility of established authorities. The airpump experiments highlighted the limitations of relying solely on reason and argument, and instead emphasized the importance of empirical evidence and observation. In this sense, Boyle's experiments were not just about air, but about challenging the very foundations of knowledge and authority.
    oter

    Leviathan and the Air-Pump

    Steven Shapin

    Open in app
    Now you can listen to your microbooks on-the-go. Download the Oter App on your mobile device and continue making progress towards your goals, no matter where you are.