Categorical imperative guides moral decisions from "summary" of Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics by Immanuel Kant
The categorical imperative, according to Kant, is a fundamental principle that guides moral decisions. It is not based on any conditional considerations or personal desires, but rather on the inherent rationality of the moral law itself. This imperative demands that individuals act only on those maxims that can be consistently universalized. In other words, one should only act in a way that they would be willing for everyone else to act in similar circumstances. Kant argues that this principle serves as a universal law that applies to all rational beings, regardless of their personal inclinations or circumstances. It is rooted in the idea that moral decisions should be made based on reason alone, rather than on emotions or desires. By following the categorical imperative, individuals are able to determine the moral worth of their actions and ensure that they are acting in accordance with their duty. Furthermore, Kant believes that the categorical imperative provides a way to test the validity of moral rules. If a maxim cannot be consistently universalized without leading to contradictions, then it cannot be considered a valid moral law. By applying this principle, individuals are able to determine whether their actions are morally permissible or not.- The categorical imperative serves as a guiding principle for making moral decisions. It emphasizes the importance of rationality and consistency in ethical decision-making, and provides individuals with a framework for evaluating the moral worth of their actions. Kant's concept of the categorical imperative is a cornerstone of his moral philosophy, and continues to be a point of discussion and debate in contemporary ethics.
