Analyzing and interpreting evidence from "summary" of Fundamentals of Forensic Science by Max M. Houck,Jay A. Siegel

Though it may seem like detective work, analyzing and interpreting evidence requires a process of logical deduction. It is important to accept only credible evidence during examination to arrive at valid conclusions.

Evaluation of evidence also helps establish potential suspects and make criminal investigations more accurate. Forensic scientists must check all available information and conduct additional tests to understand the source and significance of the evidence better.

Evidence needs to be considered for its probative value or relative weight that can lead to an affirmative answer whether it proves something or not. Examination of the collected evidence requires both qualitative and quantitative analysis.

A scientific approach is needed for correct interpretation and assessment of evidentiary material. Experts consult rules and principles from established theories and then apply them in their judgements.

Collecting and interpreting tangible evidence is a crucial part of any investigation. Gathering physical evidence such as fibers, fingerprints, DNA or soil at the crime scene gives investigators clues to solve the case.

Meticulous research must be followed before making any conclusion with regards to the evidence, since faulty reasoning can lead to incorrect assumptions. This could impact an entire case and may even lead to repercussions against innocent people.

Protracted legal arguments often require the testimony of witnesses who have personally seen the incident along with independent corroborating expert opinion. This reconciliation permits an agreement between facts determined through objective collective analysis of evidence and circumstantial facts based on subjective personal perception and experience.