Audio available in app
Recognizing faulty arguments from "summary" of A Guide to Logical Thinking by William Maurice Shanner
Faulty arguments are a common occurrence in everyday life, and being able to recognize them is a valuable skill. By understanding the different types of faulty arguments, individuals can better evaluate the strength of an argument and make more informed decisions. One common type of faulty argument is the ad hominem fallacy, where an argument attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the actual argument itself. This type of fallacy is often used to divert attention away from the weaknesses in the argument by attacking the credibility or character of the person making the argument. Another common type of faulty argument is the appeal to authority fallacy, where an argument relies on the opinion of an authority figure rather than on evidence or reason. While it can be tempting to defer to experts in a particular field, it is important to remember that even experts can be wrong. It is essential to evaluate the evidence and reasoning behind an argument rather than blindly accepting it based on the authority of the person making the argument.- The evidence provided to support the conclusion is simply a restatement of the conclusion itself, leading to a circular and ultimately unconvincing argument. By understanding these common types of faulty arguments, individuals can become more adept at identifying and avoiding them in their own thinking and in the arguments of others. This can lead to more effective communication and decision-making in various aspects of life.
